Yet Again…

by Shelt Garner
@sheltgarner

I’ve printed out the entire first act AGAIN and I’m going to go read it AGAIN in hopes of finding any weak scenes so I can re-write them. I’m really leaning into AI to do this form of development.

I hate it when AI gives me copy, writing is MY JOB.

Anyway. Things are going well with the novel as of now. I’m hoping to enter the first half of the second act pretty soon. I already know there are a number of weak scenes. It’s just annoying that I keep reading and rereading the first act. It’s time to get into the second act.

The novel continues to be a little too spicy for my needs, but, lulz, fuck it. As long as the overall story is good, I suppose I can grit my teeth and allow for a little bit more sex than might otherwise happen.

At least I didn’t start the novel with a sex scene, which I think is bad form. But, in general, I’m pretty pleased with what I’ve come up with — at least the first act. The tough part is going to be to smooth things out between the first act and the rest of the novel.

But, in general, I think if you’re a fan of Stieg Larsson’s stuff, you’ll really enjoy this novel and the planned novels that follow it.

From Russia With…Love?

by Shelt Garner
@sheltgarner

I obsess over my Webstats to a absurd degree. So when I noticed a ping from Moscow, I sat up and took notice. It was clear that they — whomever they are — searched specifically for this site.

I don’t know, there was a time in my life when such a weird event would get me really excited. As it is, sigh. I don’t care. Whatever. It is fun to think that maybe I am generating a tiny-tiny bit of buzz in some way.

I don’t know what, specifically, I’m doing that might be generating such buzz. I can’t figure out if it’s the AI stuff, the worrying about Trump tyranny stuff or the fiction navel gazing stuff.

Who knows.

Anyway, welcome my hopefully friends from Moscow. Just don’t tell Trump to arrest me.

Forget Studio Ghibli, Why Aren’t People Producing Thomas Nast Art?

by Shelt Garner
@sheltgarner

I just realized recently that ChatGPT can generate Thomas Nast-like political cartoons. As such, I’ve become low-key addicted to thinking up different political cartoons.

Just For Fun: Gawker: A Deeper Dive into Social Media Reimagined

Author: The Gawker Team

Date: April 2, 2025

Tired of the endless scroll, the shouting matches, the feeling that online conversations rarely build towards something meaningful? Here in Tightsqueeze, Virginia, looking out at the digital landscape of April 2025, we’ve been conceptualizing Gawker – not just as an alternative, but as a fundamental rethink of how online communities could function, designed for depth, collaboration, and quality from the ground up.

The Gawker Difference: Built on Pillars of Quality & Collaboration

Gawker is envisioned around several core ideas working together:

  1. Curated Participation – Earning Your Voice: Gawker proposes a different entry path. Newcomers start by observing (“gawking”), getting the lay of the land. Before posting in wider public forums, you engage within private “Family & Friends” Groups. This isn’t strict gatekeeping, but a space to learn the platform’s unique tools (like collaborative editing) and community norms, perhaps getting feedback or points from your circle to signal readiness. Even large Public Groups can thrive with vast readership while benefiting from a more curated set of contributors, ensuring a higher signal-to-noise ratio in core discussions.
  2. Focused Communities – Finding Your Niche: Inspired by the clarity of Usenet, Gawker would be built around topic-focused Groups, both Public and Private. This structure encourages communities to form around shared interests, projects, or passions, allowing for deeper, more relevant conversations.
  3. Posts as Living Documents – Beyond Static Comments: This is Gawker’s collaborative heart. Forget simple posts and linear comment threads. A Gawker post is imagined as a rich, threaded document. Multiple users (with permissions managed by the Group owner) can inline edit, add sections, refine ideas, and build knowledge together, with clear version history. When discussions branch? Built-in subthreading would allow users to seamlessly spin off focused tangents right within the main post, keeping complex conversations organized and contextually linked.

Connecting, Bridging, Sustaining: The Wider Ecosystem

Beyond the core interaction, Gawker’s concept includes features to make it more powerful and connected:

  • Bridging the Web – Interactive Content Import: We’re exploring an ambitious vision where trusted publishers could potentially import entire web pages (layout intact!) into Gawker. Imagine communities collaboratively annotating news articles, research papers, or tutorials directly on the platform, transforming passive consumption into active analysis.
  • Building Partnerships – A Sustainable Content Model: To encourage bringing such valuable content onto Gawker, one idea involves partnering with content creators. This could involve models like sharing revenue (perhaps from non-intrusive ads specifically around their imported content), creating a symbiotic relationship that benefits publishers, users, and the platform.
  • Staying Informed Without Drowning – Pings & The Feed: Focused groups need intelligent connection. Gawker would include Pings (@mentions) for direct user notifications. Crucially, a smart, personalized Newsfeed would aggregate truly important activity – key edits, mentions, relevant new posts – across all your groups. The goal isn’t another noisy feed, but an efficient way to stay informed about what matters to you.

The Vision: A Smarter Social Web

Imagine these elements working in concert: curated participation ensuring quality, focused groups providing relevance, deeply collaborative posts enabling creation, powerful integration with external content, and smart tools keeping you connected efficiently. This is the Gawker vision – an online environment built not just for fleeting reactions, but for sustained collaboration, knowledge building, and genuinely thoughtful interaction. We believe that by designing for quality first, perhaps starting with a curated, invite-only launch, a truly different kind of online community can emerge.

Gawker is more than just features; it’s a concept aimed at elevating online discourse. It’s about building a space where collaboration thrives and quality conversation is the norm. Imagine the possibilities.

Just For Fun: Gawker: Ditching the Noise, Rebuilding Conversation Online

Author: The Gawker Team

Date: April 2, 2025

We all feel it, don’t we? The endless scroll through algorithmically-charged feeds, the comment sections devolving into shouting matches, the feeling that meaningful connection and deep conversation online are getting harder and harder to find. Here in Tightsqueeze, Virginia, we’ve been thinking – maybe the problem isn’t us, maybe it’s the platforms.

What if we built something different? Something designed not just for fleeting engagement, but for durable knowledge and real collaboration?

Introducing the concept of Gawker.

What is Gawker?

Imagine blending the focused, community-driven spirit of early Usenet newsgroups with the powerful collaborative potential of modern tools like Google Docs. That’s the core of Gawker. It’s a social network built on a few key principles aimed at fostering a higher quality of interaction:

  1. Learn Before You Leap: Remember dipping your toes into a new community? Gawker embraces this. When you first join, you’re encouraged to observe – to “gawk” – and get a feel for the place. Before diving into wide public discussions, you’ll start by engaging in Private Groups with your chosen circle (think “Family and Friends”). Here, you’ll interact, share ideas, and get comfortable with the platform’s unique tools, perhaps earning points or kudos from your circle to signal you’re ready for the next step. It’s about fostering contribution readiness, not gatekeeping.
  2. Focused Groups, Your Way: Like the best online communities, Gawker revolves around Groups. Create or join public or private groups dedicated to specific topics, hobbies, projects, or interests. Find your niche and connect with others who share your passion.
  3. Posts as Living, Collaborative Documents: This is where Gawker truly changes the game. Forget static posts and messy comment threads. A Gawker post is a rich, threaded document. Multiple users (with permissions set by the Group owner) can inline edit, annotate, add sections, and refine information together. Imagine:
    • Building comprehensive FAQs and guides collaboratively.
    • Workshopping creative projects in real-time within the discussion.
    • Dissecting complex topics with integrated notes and contributions.
    • Creating dynamic knowledge bases that evolve with the community’s input.

Why This Approach? Quality Over Clutter.

Gawker’s structure is designed to cultivate a healthier online ecosystem. By starting users in familiar “Family and Friends” groups, we encourage learning the ropes in a lower-stakes environment. By allowing Public Groups to potentially have vast audiences but limited, curated contributors (those who’ve passed the initial phase), we aim to elevate the quality of public discourse. Imagine popular discussions filled with contributions from people invested in the community, not drive-by trolls.

The Vision: A Space to Build Together

We envision Gawker as the platform where enthusiasts collaboratively build the ultimate guide to their hobby, where professionals refine industry best practices in an open document, where communities co-author their own stories and knowledge bases. It’s a move away from ephemeral content towards building lasting value, together.

Getting Started

We believe there’s a hunger for a different kind of online space. To ensure Gawker launches with the quality and thoughtfulness it deserves, we envision a curated, invite-only start, bringing in key voices and community builders to lay the foundation and generate the kind of content worth “gawking” at. We’re confident that when people experience a platform built for depth, the network effect of a truly “better mousetrap” will follow.

It’s time for a social network that respects conversation and empowers collaboration. It’s time for Gawker.

Are you ready for something different?

My Passion Project Is Too Spicy

by Shelt Garner
@sheltgarner

I have to stop living in denial about this — my passion project thriller is probably too spicy for its own good. And I’m not getting any younger, so I really need to think seriously about how I spend my creative time.

I say that, then throw myself back into the very spicy novel that I keep telling myself I need to put aside so I can focus on something more marketable. I have a number of really good scifi novels I can work on. One in particular remains at the forefront of my mind all the time

And, yet, I really like the thriller. I know, just know, that if I keep at it I can produce something good enough that it will sell. There is the basic problem of how good — or bad — my writing may be, but I can only use AI to fix that particular situation so much.

So, I guess I will continue to work on the spicy thriller, damn the consequences. I keep toying with the other, scifi novels, in my mind, but nothing has really resonated to the point that I want to work on them like I continue to work on the spicey thriller.