Facebook May Be About To Get ‘Zucked’ By An Open Source LLM

by Shelt Garner
@sheltgarner


I’ve reached a Singularity of the Martha Mitchell syndrome — absolutely no one listens to me for any reason. But, nonetheless, it does seem as though we’re on the cusp of a major disruption in, well, everything between now and about 2030 because of LLMs.

Using existing LLM technology — or, more specifically, open source LLM technology — some plucky college student could design a Apple Knowledge Navigator-like personal agent that could totally disrupt Facebook.

Or, as Claude LLM would tell us:

This is an interesting question that touches on several cutting-edge areas of AI and technology. Here’s an overview of how a college student might approach creating an Apple Knowledge Navigator-like personal agent using open source LLM technology, and how it could potentially disrupt Facebook:

  1. Core LLM:
    Start with an open-source large language model like LLaMA, BLOOM, or GPT-J as the foundation. These models can be fine-tuned or adapted for specific tasks.
  2. Personalization:
    Implement techniques like constitutional AI or parameter-efficient fine-tuning (PEFT) to customize the model to individual users’ preferences and interaction styles.
  3. Multimodal capabilities:
    Integrate open-source computer vision models (e.g. CLIP) and speech recognition/synthesis systems to enable voice and visual interactions.
  4. Knowledge integration:
    Develop a system to continually update the agent’s knowledge base from reliable sources, perhaps using retrieval-augmented generation techniques.
  5. Task automation:
    Create APIs and plugins to allow the agent to interact with various services and perform tasks on behalf of the user.
  6. Privacy and security:
    Implement strong encryption and local processing where possible to protect user data.
  7. User interface:
    Design an intuitive, conversational interface that makes interacting with the agent feel natural and effortless.

Potential for disrupting Facebook:

  1. Personalized content curation: The agent could provide a more tailored and diverse feed of information than Facebook’s algorithm.
  2. Privacy-focused social networking: By prioritizing user privacy, it could appeal to those concerned about Facebook’s data practices.
  3. Intelligent task assistance: Offering more practical help in daily life could make it a preferred platform over traditional social media.
  4. Decentralized communication: The agent could facilitate direct peer-to-peer interactions, reducing reliance on centralized platforms.
  5. Enhanced productivity: By integrating with work and personal tools, it could become a more essential part of users’ digital lives than Facebook.
  6. Emotional intelligence: With advanced natural language understanding, the agent could provide more meaningful social interactions.
  7. Ad-free model: If monetized through other means (e.g. premium features), it could offer an attractive alternative to ad-driven platforms.

While ambitious, this project would face significant challenges in terms of computational resources, data collection, and user adoption. However, the potential for innovation in this space is substantial.

Facebook’s Half-Assed ‘Deplatforming’ of Me


by Shelt Garner
@sheltgarner

Welp, I’m in a curious limbo with Facebook. First, some context. I’ve been using Facebook since about 2007 and as during the Trump Era all I did was rant — often with a lot of “fucks” — about how angry I was about it.

So, if that’s the reason why they’ve put me in a time-out while they “evaluate” my case, I get it. But they’ve been “evaluating” my case for six months now and even though they blame it on COVID….it definitely seems as though they don’t want me around anymore.

I guess I just they would just be more honest about it. Or, at the very least, fish or cut bait. Either let me back on the platform or tell me that I was, in my own way, being too deranged for their liking.

It’s a very surreal feeling being unable to use Facebook. I feel like the Isaac Asimov character in a short story of his who is unable even to use a computer — the court forbids is.

Anyway. At least I have the novel.